E117 over indented ошибка

def a(b):
	return b  # indented with tab

test.py:2:1: W191 indentation contains tabs
	return b
^
    On new projects, spaces-only are strongly recommended over tabs.

    Okay: if True:n    return
    W191: if True:ntreturn
test.py:2:2: E117 over-indented
	return b
	^
    Use 4 spaces per indentation level.

    For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
    to use 8-space tabs.

    Okay: a = 1
    Okay: if a == 0:n    a = 1
    E111:   a = 1
    E114:   # a = 1

    Okay: for item in items:n    pass
    E112: for item in items:npass
    E115: for item in items:n# Hin    pass

    Okay: a = 1nb = 2
    E113: a = 1n    b = 2
    E116: a = 1n    # b = 2

I’m currently ignoring E117 as a workaround, which can mask actual E117 errors.

That’s mostly a matter of tab historycally being used to indent by 8. The only way to make this work «properly» would be to add an option for what a tab should be expanded into, imo.

My comment from #837:

PEP8 says:

Use 4 spaces per indentation level.

If a tab is used as indentation (my preference), it should be assumed to have a tabwidth of 4 by default.

If other codebases are using other tabwidths (8 and 2 are probably the most common alternatives), then it might make more sense to add a config option to allow customizing tabwidth rather than having the default divert that far from PEP8.

(Note also the existence of flake8-tabs.)

this is fixed on master:

$ python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
$

@GPHemsley the standard width of a tab is 8 btw

@asottile There is no «standard» width of a tab. The default width of a tab differs depending on what domain it appears in. In the domain of programming, most IDEs allow tab size to be configured by the user (or the file).

But we’re not talking about broader culture here; we’re talking about Python code styling. (We could argue about which size is better in other domains, but that would be off-topic.)

As I said above, in the domain of Python code styling, I think having the default size match the Python indentation size (4) would be best, with a configuration option allowing that to be overridden.

I also think it’s important to distinguish between indentation using a combination of tabs and spaces (always bad) and indentation using only tabs (likely programmer preference).

python treats a tab as 8 spaces (try in python2), so yes there is a standard width in python

I also think it’s important to distinguish between indentation using a combination of tabs and spaces (always bad) and indentation using only tabs (likely programmer preference).

Believe it or not, there’s a better reason than «programmer preference» to prefer always using tabs; Accessibility and screen readers. Tabs are better for programmers who either have to verbally dictate code or rely on a screen reader to read it back to them.

I also think it’s important to distinguish between indentation using a combination of tabs and spaces (always bad) and indentation using only tabs (likely programmer preference).

Believe it or not, there’s a better reason than «programmer preference» to prefer always using tabs; Accessibility and screen readers. Tabs are better for programmers who either have to verbally dictate code or rely on a screen reader to read it back to them.

Indeed. I should have said that indentation using only tabs would be «likely an active decision on the part of the programmer».

closing given the fix on master

closing given the fix on master

Can you please point to the fix on (which) master so we know when it is fixed? Many thanks!

here’s how I found the answer to that, I’m not sure why this wasn’t linked as a duplicate of #836

here’s the commands I ran to figure this out. First I wanted to figure out what commit fixed this issue.

git bisect start
# these are backwards because we "fixed" it instead of introducing a regression
# which is the "normal" use for `git bisect`
git bisect good 2.5.0
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect run bash -c '! python3 -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191'

and that ends up with this:

$ git bisect run bash -c '! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191'
running bash -c ! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
Bisecting: 13 revisions left to test after this (roughly 4 steps)
[e5cdc22a29bf0c4abe30c152f81124e4b7a5dad7] Add lines breaks
running bash -c ! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
Bisecting: 6 revisions left to test after this (roughly 3 steps)
[a5488e2817637eca9def0be4b329566a1ed0f231] Merge pull request #848 from adamchainz/tox_url
running bash -c ! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
Bisecting: 2 revisions left to test after this (roughly 2 steps)
[dd1d313152a136f80c9ac3d508d2d99d6b3dc0a8] Expect lines to be indented 8 places when tabs are used
running bash -c ! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this (roughly 1 step)
[ac1c5e579c840e20544e9d65dbcebc1ecd9bf796] Merge pull request #832 from asottile/patch-1
running bash -c ! python -m pycodestyle t.py --ignore=W191
t.py:2:2: E117 over-indented
dd1d313152a136f80c9ac3d508d2d99d6b3dc0a8 is the first bad commit
commit dd1d313152a136f80c9ac3d508d2d99d6b3dc0a8
Author: Jon Dufresne <jon.dufresne@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Jan 31 16:38:31 2019 -0800

    Expect lines to be indented 8 places when tabs are used
    
    Fixes #836

 pycodestyle.py          |  8 +++++---
 testsuite/E10.py        |  4 ++--
 testsuite/E11.py        |  3 +++
 testsuite/E90.py        |  2 +-
 testsuite/W19.py        | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 testsuite/test_api.py   |  4 ++--
 testsuite/test_shell.py |  2 +-
 7 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
bisect run success

so then we want to see when that commit got released, we use the following command:

$ git describe --contains dd1d313152a136f80c9ac3d508d2d99d6b3dc0a8
2.6.0a1~18^2

so that says that this was integrated 18 commits before 2.6.0a1 was released, meaning any version after that will contain it